PDF’s are Bad!

 Or at the moment at least they are. A new security flaw has popped up (Here and Here).

Want an example? Try Clicking this, it's ok though that will not do anything nasty.

The good news? It seems that FoxIt on Vista (either IE or Firefox) does not exibit the behaviour, however at the moment (as Justin has said) it looks like pretty much all versions of Adobe's Acrobat plugin do exibit the issue.

So my advice? Pop over to Foxit Software for there PDF reader, not only does it not have the issue, it's a good deal faster and smaller as well.

HD-DVD Backup v1.0

Muslix64 has released (as promised) version 1 of his HD-DVD Backup tool.

This little utill bypasses the AACS encryption scheme allowing you to backup your HD-DVD discs. The other benefits of this is that, with the HDCP DVI protection removed you can watch your HD-DVD on any computer that is capable of replaying the content.

Lego NXT

It's just this simple, I want some Lego NXT….. Think the Toyota/Lexus self parking is cool? well watch this!

Review: Sandisk Sansa 6GB

Sandisk is a well-known and respected name in the solid state storage market. Up until recently, it was not really known at all in the media player market. They are, however, obviously a quick learner: recently they became the number two seller in the market, behind Apple, with the SanDisk Sansa 6GB.

The design of the Sansa will be nothing new to anyone who has used an MP3 player in the past. There is certainly a homage to the iPod in this device with the rotating wheel.

The Sansa is thicker than Apple's Nano, but this is no bad thing, as what it lacks in miniaturisation, it makes up for in its screen and abilities.

The Sansa has the ability to play video, as well as display picture slideshows. This is great for watching music videos and the like; however, I would not like to watch a movie on it as the screen is just not large enough. That said, the screen is a good one; it shows a good level of clarity on the device's menus. There's also the ability to record audio using either the supplied microphone, or the device's built in microphone.

The player is well bolted together as well. The back of the device is metal, and the front seems to be fairly resistant to scratches and scuffs. The left hand side of the device has the slot for a MicroSD expansion card, a great idea if you need a bit more space.

The interface itself is quite intuitive and easy to navigate, but it is not without its issues. For one thing, it would be nice to be able to tell the device to play an album, rather than having to select first the album, then the first track. The playlist functionality could also do with a tweak or two.

There are a couple of little niggles in the hardware as well: the record button - used to activate the microphone - is unfortunately set on the left top of the device; if you use it with your right hand, it is very easy to press by accident. You do get used to it, though. There is one other technical issue that is not so easy to solve - there are four buttons around the scroll wheel, and because of the height of the scroll wheel it is sometimes difficult to easily press them when needed.

The USB connector is a proprietary interface, forcing you to carry a cable for the device around with you. "Why?" you may ask! You do not get an AC charger in the box, so the only way to recharge the Sansa is via an active USB port. This would not be a real issue if you could use a standard USB cable, as almost everyone has one hanging around. There is also the potential problem of being more likely to lose the cable if you're carrying it around all the time.

While I am talking of issues and USB cables, it is worth mentioning that you cannot use the device while it is being charged. As soon as you plug it into the PC the device goes into its sync mode and stops playing. The difficulty this causes is not necessarily in the playback, but rather the problem of when and how do you charge the device? You cannot use it while it is charging, and if you have no AC charger you'll have to leave a PC on overnight to charge it.

The Sansa is a PlaysForSure device, and as such the synchronisation software — for music at least — is Windows Media Player. I know this may sound controversial, but I welcome this feature in a device! iTunes is one of my personal pet hates; I just cannot understand why Apple insist on forcing it upon people (I personally use AnaPod Explorer instead).

Connecting the device to your PC is simplicity itself. If you have Media Player 9 or later, it is just a matter of plugging the device in, selecting which music to sync, and click the sync button. If you don't use Media Player, you can just drag MP3 or WMA files onto the device straight from explorer, as the Sansa shows up as a drive under "My Computer". It's also worth noting that the device uses the USB Media Transfer Protocol (MTP) interface by default, and as such any media software that supports MTP will be able to synchronise with the device. It can be switched back to the older USB Media Storage Class (MSC) format for greater compatibility.

I tested the device in MSC mode to check the performance, which, for the curious, isn't fast enough to use it as a ReadyBoost device in Windows Vista. As you can see to the left, the actual performance of the device as a flash disk is not that great, but it does outperform the Nano ever so slightly.

This makes synchronisation over USB 2 quick and painless. The same can be said about copying movies to the player, but although this is easy, it is a little disappointing that it cannot be managed from inside Media Player.

Sandisk ship a cut-down version of ArcSoft media converter to do the video encoding. The device supports MJPEG video at 15fps, and the Sansa Media Converter software does a quick and decent job of converting and copying the video to the device. It is a bit of a pity that the player does not use WMV and the Media Player synchronisation. This will probably not be an issue; as I mentioned the device's screen is really not large enough to use as a video player in any real sense, but you could get away with a cartoon or two. The same software allows you to convert photos for use on the device, and is just as simple to use.

One part of the device we could not review here is the FM receiver. This is because, in the EU, the radio is — bizarrely — disabled due to tax laws. If you purchase an E series device outside of the EU, then you get a radio as well.

Sound

The most important part of an MP3 player is the sound quality, and here it is just fine. Testing the device side by side with a 4GB iPod Nano showed no definitive quality issues, and one surprise was that the headphones bundled are not useless! They're no Sennheisers, but they're not bad at all for freebies.

Speaking of Sennheisers, I tested a set of MX550s on both the Sansa and the iPod Nano, and playing the same tracks on each player showed that the iPod Nano edges out the Sansa in the upper range. That said, the Sansa definitely has the edge in the low range. Because of this, choosing purely on sound, it comes down to the sort of music you listen to. If you are a fan of bassier music, the Sansa will most likely sound better.

Worth noting here is that when a low bitrate MP3 was played, and the music was complex, the iPod Nano was certainly the better sounding device. If a 128k MP3 was used on the iPod Nano and a 128k WMA on the Sansa, then the Sansa edged the Nano out.

The difference was not noticeable with files at 256k and above, but it's worth noting that the WMA files where smaller than the equivalent MP3s.

The one thing that the iPod Nano can do musically that the Sansa cannot is gapless playback. Now, it's new to the iPod range as well, but at the moment the Sansa has a slight pause between tracks. This may be resolved in a future firmware release.

Conclusion

So then, should you buy one? There are certainly some issues, but none of them are great enough to put you off. Depending on the way you use the device, the charging issue could be a stumbling block. The device is far cheaper than the equivalent iPod, and not needing to use iTunes is always a bonus.

The Sansa also has more features than the Nano, and as such is better value, and probably the better choice.

That said, the iPod has a style that has captured the public's affections. As such, that's the device that is more likely to be bought this Christmas, even if, in reality, the Sansa is the one Santa should be supplying.

Kanguru Biometric USB Drive

USB memory sticks are a dime a dozen at the moment; they are cheap, and easily available. So, why then would you pay $99 for a 256Mb device like the Kanguru Biometric USB drive?

The selling point of the drive is that it will keep your data secure by using a built in fingerprint reader, and uses the fingerprint to encrypt the data stored on the flash disk.

 First up let's look at the specs for the device:

  • 256MB - 4GB internal storage (device reviewed is the 256MB version).
  • Can store up to 5 fingerprints.
  • Write Protection Switch.
  • Can be used on any user level; You don’t have to be the Administrator on the PC to use it.
  • The security application runs entirely from the Bio Drive so you never have to install software on any computer.
  • Software is preloaded and ready to go out of the box.
  • Optional password recovery.
  • User friendly setup.
  • High Speed USB2.0 Interface.
  • Top grade fingerprint sensor-508 DPI.
  • Windows 98/ME/2000/XP compatible.
  • Read Speed 8MB/s.
  • Write Speed 7MB/s.
  • Sensor type Capacity Area Sensor (236×192 pixels).

But enough of the techie stuff, the question is "does it work"? To be honest, I was expecting the device to not work; I use Vista as my day-to-day OS. The good news is that Vista has the drivers included, so I shouldn't have worried.

Once the device is installed in Windows, two new drives present themselves to the operating system. One of these is, by default, inaccessible. The other contains the software that allows access, via your fingerprint, to the contents of the device.

On the first run of the software you're asked to go through the setup routine for the device. This is simple in itself. You are first asked for the device serial number, this is in the box for the device.

After you put the serial number in, the system will ask you to "Enroll". This is the process by which the device learns your fingerprints.

Simply select a finger to scan, then run your finger over the sensor a few times and the device will tell you that it has learned that print.

The device is capable of learning five different prints, and you can type in a recovery password, just in case. The only thing I should mention, as it's not obvious, is as soon as you have finished learning prints you can simply click the X; there is no continue or complete button, which is slightly odd, but not really a problem.

After that, instead of the configuration application launching when you insert the device, you get the device access menu.

From this you can click the "FD-Pass" option and scan your print, this will allow access to the encrypted drive area.

There are other options as well, "Setup" restarts the learning application, and "Practice" does just that. However there is one more application, "Screen Lock".

The "Screen Lock" application starts a screen-saver, and only allows you to unlock the PC if you use your fingerprint.

Even though it's a great idea, it perhaps does not go far enough. Restarting the PC will work around that lock.

Ideally, the drive needs a GINA (Windows login security screen) replacement that will allow you to use your fingerprint to login to Windows. Then, the normal screen lock (part of the Windows screen-saver menu) will also require the fingerprint unlock.

There are companies that already do this - IBM recently integrated it into some of their T series laptops. The T series also had another feature that I would like to see on this device: a password saver. If all your passwords could be safely encrypted to the device, using your fingerprint to unlock them, life would be so much easier!

That said, it could only be a software release away, and perhaps Kanguru will look into some of these features at a later date.

On to the performance of the device. After all, that's its prime use.

The picture to the right will show you the benchmark figures I obtained from the device in the real world, and though Kanguru claim 8MB/s it's actually a little below that on my device.

This is not actually very quick. Yes, it's probably quick enough to use for small everyday documents etc, but not for large file transfers.

I could not test to see if the 4kb block performance is good enough to run the drive with Vista's ReadyBoost, as that requires more than 256MB on the external storage, and the Kanguru device has 230MB free (it seems 26MB of the device is used for the fingerprint software).

For comparison reasons, I have overlaid the benchmark from a SanDisk Cruzer 2GB. This shows that USB 2 devices can perform better than the Kanguru device does.

You will notice from this chart that the Kanguru does have one performance trick up it's sleeve, the random access time one the Kanguru is good, as is its CPU utilisation.

The CPU will probably be because the device is not taxing the USB Bus in any real way, however the quick random access times show that the device has used decent internal components, and may well be usable as a Vista ReadyBoost drive. However, there are complications here as well, as you will have to swipe for access every time you want to use it for the ReadyBoost function.

So in conclusion, the idea behind the device is a good one. Secure data has its place - especialy inside big business - and using a Biometric form of protection is certainly one of the better solutions, as the device will proably be used by management and HR. These people are usually not classed as technical, and this device has a nice, simple, intuitive interface for access.

The device is let down slightly by it's lack of throughput performance, and it could have added value if Kanguru invest a little time in the software integration with Windows, and possibly OSX/Unix support. It is also odd that they have not shipped any U3 style software with the device (U3 and the other software allows you to take your documents, applications and settings with you).

If you need a flash drive for general use there are certainly better and cheaper alternatives on the market. However, if you need to secure the data that you store on the flash drive, then the Kanguru Biometric is certainly the one to go for.

Links

Kanguru Site

The names Martin, Aston Martin

Well, ok this is actually a review of the new Bond flick Casino Royale. I'm going to come at this review from a strange perspective though (as the title might suggest), so if your looking for a 'proper' review then pop over and see Dan's site.

No my review is not going to be of the movie, no, rather it will be of the movies stars - The Cars.

Before you dismiss this as a bad idea, think about it, has there ever been a bad bond car?

Let's go through the list, but here I will add a warning, it get's nerdy from here on in, so either be a car, Bond or ideally both fan before continuing.

Bonds car in the Flemming books was not as most people think an Aston Martin, no it was 1930 Bentley Convertible, complete with a 4.5ltr supercharged engine. It was actually mentioned in the Casino Royale book as Bonds hobby. Flemming however got his dates wrong, as it's stated that he bought the car almost new in 1933, then in Live and Let Die states it was a 1933 model, however the 4.5ltr SC ceased production in 1930. Flemming later corrected his error in the Moonraker book.

When the movies were released however the car was given a staring role rather than just the sideline role the books had given it.

Possibly the most famous Bond car is the Aston Martin DB5. This appeared primarily in Goldfinger, Thunderball, GoldenEye and now in Casino Royale.

The car was also the one to introduce us to the Q branch of MI6. It was the car to receive the standard bulletproof panels and revolving number plates and the famous ejector seat.

The Aston Martin DB Mark III was used by Ian Flemming in the Goldfinger book. However the DB Mark III was not used in the movie, and was replaced with the DB5 above.

The reason for this was one of sponsorship. The DB5 was the car that Aston Martin had for sale in the early 60's, where the DB Mark III had gone out of production in 1959 to be replaced by the DB4/5.

You only live twice did not feature many cars, instead the star of the motor show was the Gyrocopter called 'Little Nellie'. There was however a very special car featured in the movie, even if most people will not notice it. Toyota actually built two 'one off' 2000GT Convertibles. These where the only convertible versions of the 2000GT ever built, one is on show in the Toyota headquarters in Japan.

The next movie brought back the Aston Martin. On Her Majesties Secret Service saw a new Bond (George Lazenby), and it also saw a new Aston. The Aston Martin DBS was used by the Australian Bond. The car did not have a big part in either of the movies it featured in (it was also seen in Diamonds are Forever). It did however steal the scenes it was in. The car was in the pre-credits, and it was also the car Bond got married in. Diamonds are Forever also included the Ford Mustang Mach 1 Fastback.

The Man with the Golden Gun featured a reduced car line up (in the sexy car stake that is). There was the Silver Shadow, but the car that everyone remembers is the AMC Hornet, yup the one that does the corkscrew jump.

The Spy Who Loved Me brought another one of the memorable Bond cars. Yup it was the 70's and the first of the Lotus Esprit's to feature in Bond.

This Bond car was the most Q'd up car yet. It was not only a mobile gun platform, but a submarine as well.

The next Lotus was the Esprit Turbo. There was actually two Esprit's in this movie, Bond has the white one blown up (security system) at the beginning of the movie, and is then provided with possibly the worst colour Bond car ever, a burgundy Esprit Turbo.

Octopussy featured no Bond cars as such, however it is interesting in that one of the cars used in the movie (Bond steals it in a getaway) is an Alfa Romeo GTV 6 Quadrifoglio, rare and possibly the best Alfa of the period.

Timothy Dolton took over the role of Bond in The Living Daylights. In this he was equipped again with a Q'd out Aston Martin. This time it was one of the best sounding cars of all time, the Aston Martin V8 Vantage Volante.

GoldenEye introduces another couple of names. Those names are BMW, Ferrari and Pierce Brosnan. The Ferrari in question was a F355 GTS. In the movie Bond races Xenia Onatopp down a mountain side in his DB5. Now we all know in the real world Bond would not stand a chance. But the sequence is good, and shows off some nice driving. The movie also famously has the T-55 Tank chase sequence. The Bond car however was a BMW Z3, it was the first non British Bond car, and is only actually seen in one scene of the movie.

Tomorrow Never Dies has an excellent scene with a BMW 750iL. Bond uses the car to escape the bad guys in a chase sequence inside a multi story car park. The nice thing about this car is that the writers obviously realised that a German car for an English gentleman was not perhaps the greatest marketing choice. They where however stuck with it having signed a 3 movie deal, and decided to play on the Germanity of the car. The 750iL features a female computer voice with a very 'German' manorism.

The World is Not Enough featured the last of the BMW cars. This one was the BMW Z8 and also did not feature highly in the movie. This is the last time that Desmond Llewelyn hosts the Q role. The car get's cut in half late on in the film.

Die Another Day brought Aston Martin back to the Bond car role. The Aston Martin V12 Vanquish is used in the last of the Pierce Brosnan movies. This car along with it's sister Jaguar XKR are used for some of the big segments of the movie. There is a great car chase on ice. The Jaguar is the bad guy car and has as many toys as the Aston Martin. The Aston however can cloak itself, and uses this to save the girl.

That brings us gloriously onto Casino Royale. The star car of this show is again the Aston Martin DBS. However this is the new DBS, and is one fine looking car.

It's based on the Aston Martin DB9, but where that looks pretty, the DBS looks purposeful.

The DBS comes to an unfortunate end in the movie, but by then has already stolen the heart of the petrol heads amongst us.

The car does not feature as a moving object quite as much as it possibly should, and is not as gadget laden (maybe) as some of Bond's previous cars. It does hint at a gadget laden underbelly though. The car after all saves Bond's life (twice if you count the fact he does not die in the accident). Aston Martin have stated that the DBS will go on sale next year, and although it will not be quite the same as the Bond edition, it will certainly keep all the important parts of this stars character.

The DB5 also makes a welcome return in a guest appearance, if only breifly, the old dear is still looking and sounding great.

There is one unwelcome sight though. The new Ford Mondeo shows it's face at the start of the movie. It's not that it's a bad car, or even that bad looking. No it's just that it's not a Bond car!

We all look back at Bond movies from the past 54 years and know that all the Bond cars have got that, well, Bondness about them. The Mondeo however will not hold up to that, in 15 or 20 years time it will just be an old Mondeo no matter how many shiny bolt on's they put on the car.

That said it's not in the movie for very long, and if the producers had to pay Ford Motor Corp to use the DBR by using the Mondeo, then it was worth it.

To the movie then. I would say it's a cracking Bond film, and all the Daniel Craig neigh sayers (myself included) have been proven wrong. He is a good Bond!

The book is well honored, even if it's all been updated like Texas Holdem instead of Baccarat. The torture scenes have come across well from the book.

There are some great action scenes, the Parkour scene at the beginning of the movie is well done, and very cleverly shot, and the part is played by Sebastien Foucan, who is widely considered to be the father of the sport.

The little niggle in the movie was that the Sony brand showed up FAR too often. I don't mind a bit of product placement, but the brand was everywhere in the movie. That said Ford did a good job as well, not only was the Mondeo and Aston featured, there was Jaguar and Land Rover as well.

All I can say is, go and watch it yourself, it's a good movie. Long live bond, and hurry up with Bond 22!

DSG: The Future Of The Gearbox

The VAG Direct Shift Gearbox - sometimes called the S-Tronic in the Audi range - is the world's first production dual clutch semi automatic gearbox. The system was developed for Audi by BorgWarner for use in the companies Audi TT 3.2V6, and was so well received it is now used in much of the Volkswagen Audi Group range.

The DSG is often compared to F1 style automated or robotic manual gearboxes, but differs in some very important ways.

The DSG gearbox is, however, not a new invention. The system was first designed by Andolphe Kégresse just before the second world war but because of the lack of technology, not to mention the war, he never produced a working version of the Dual Clutch Gearbox (DCG). The system was used by another German car company in the 80's though: Porsche used the PDK (Porsche Doppelkupplungs) system in their 956 and 962 Le Mans race cars, and Audi used the same system in the Sport Quatro S1. Porsche and Audi have a long history of technology sharing.

Both of these uses eventually faded, primarily because the computing technology that allows the system to work so effectively did not prove to be reliable enough in the tough and demanding world of the race car.

To understand how revolutionary the DSG gearbox is, first I will explain the F1 style systems. These differ in name depending on the manufacturer; Ferrari call theirs the F1 system, and BMW call theirs the SMG system.

These gearboxes all have one thing in common: they are just manual gearboxes, with a manual clutch that is operated by pneumatics. This method has many of the benefits the DSG box does. The gearbox itself weighs less: as the gear change is accurate, and no human mistakes can be made, the materials can be less hardy. They are also far more performant than the manual equivalent, both the BMW SMG II and the Ferrari F1 systems change cogs in around 80 milliseconds. This means that, while the gear is being shifted, all the power from the engine is waisted and a feeling of on-off-on is felt in the car as the pneumatics shift from in gear, to clutched, and then back into gear. The smoothness of this in the car depends on the software controlling it: for the fastest changes it can feel quite 'bumpy', similar to a bad gear change in a manual car. The only way of releaving this issue in the past was to fit a torque converter, this is the way that a standard auto box does it, and why it feels far smoother than any of the manual gearboxes produced. A torque converter, however, is very wasteful in terms of power, and usually very heavy.

The DSG box takes the basic idea of pneumatic clutched boxes a step further. The heart of the DSG comes from the fact it has two clutches. The basic idea being that the gearbox can then have two gears engaged at any one time, one driving the car, the other waiting to take over.

The clutch arrangement is setup for odds and evens, where clutch 1 operates the 1-3-5 gears and clutch 2 operates 2-4-6.

DSG works by allowing the software to decide what gear the car will need next, and then pre-selects it. If you are accelerating, it will have the next gear up, and likewise if decelerating, the next gear down.

The system can then watch for a change signal - this is either done by clicking the corresponding paddle by the driver, or if in full auto mode the computer - and the gearbox can then tell the currently disengaged clutch (the one driving) to engage, and at the same time tells the engaged clutch (the pre-selected gear) to disengage. In this way the driver and passengers do not experience the on-off-on feeling associated with manual gearboxes. Instead, the gear change feels much more like that of an automatic gearbox.

However, because the change happens so quickly - around 8 milliseconds - the engine can maintain drive and the losses involved in the gear change are much reduced. This can be seen visually in the video below.

The video clearly shows the benefits of the DSG vs a very quick-changing manual driver.

The DSG gearbox is obviously controlled by computer, and this adds other benefits as well, even over race-going Sequential Manual Transmisions.

The computer in the DSG box monitors many of the cars sensors, these can be RPM, speed, angle of steering input, amount of wheel spin, braking and g-forces. It can then use these inputs to make decisions on which gear the car has to be in at any one moment.

For example, if you are approaching a tight corner you may want to change down two or even three gears. The computer sees that you are braking heavily, and that steering input is being applied, and can then change down either more quickly, or skip gears altogether and shift from sixth into third in one step. This allows the driver to keep the RPM in the best range for drivability. Likewise, if driving in snow or mud, the computer sees that there is a lot of wheel spin at low speeds, it can then shift up into a higher gear to allow the wheel spin to be controlled.

 

>

The gearbox also keeps the F1 style gearbox's benefits. Because the computer will change gear very precisely, and not over stress the components, the weight of the whole unit is not much more than a conventional gearbox and clutch. This is because the parts can be made to much tighter tolerances, but still manage the same life expectancy as the manual counterparts.

There is a downside to the gearbox though: it cannot be used in races. This is because it changes gear so quickly, and the loss of drive is so minute, that the gearbox gets classed as a Constantly Variable Transmision. The FIA and other governing bodies outlawed this in the early 80s. However, with the speed that some of the current Formula One cars can now change, this may be altered. The current Honda gearbox is called the 'Lossless' gearbox after all, but they did prove that it reduces engine power and its use was therefore allowed.

 The crowning achievement of the DSG is the English-made, Ricardo Company's seven speed DSG, for use in the Bugatti Veyron. That particular car is worthy of it's own - more detailed - article, so that will have to wait.

So, next time you drive a DSG car just think: You can change gear faster than even the Formula One and Indy drivers.

Special thanks to Audi for the images and the link to the video demonstrating the gearbox in action.

AKU 3.2 on the Universal

I've been running the AKU 3.2 update on my MDA Pro for a few days now, and thought I would say how it's coming along.

My first impressions of it seemed to be correct, it feels faster and more stable, and it is.

All of the applications I have installed on it work fine, so far. The new IE is much better, not quite Opera, but getting there.

The ability to use MP3/WMA audio for notifications is a godsend, there so much smaller than the equivalent WAV files that you used to have to use.

Also, even if you are not thinking of going to AKU 3.2, then I highly recommend upgrading to radio stack 1.13. Not only is the Bluetooth now certainly more stable (not had any spurious disconnects from my Parrot 3300), but the UMTS network coverage is certainly better, I get the UMTS connection in places that it just never happened before.

On my drive home in the evening I noticed that the network is mostly T-Mobile UMTS UK, where it used to be T-Mobile UK (GPRS).

If you were thinking about the upgrade, I say do it. You won't be sorry.

Flckr + MCE (Vista)

 I've been looking around for a plugin to do Flickr in Media Center for a while now. I've come accross one, and it's not bad!

Big Screen Photo's allows you to do just that, it uses the .Net  V3 (WinFX Beta) so you have to have that on the box, and will work on both MCE2005 and Vista.

Pop along and grab a copy if you use MCE and Flickr, you wont reget it.

For those that don’t know

IE7 Release Candidate 1 has been released.

Pop along to the Microsoft download site for it.

« Previous PageNext Page »